International journal of the classical tradition, 23 252268. The mention is called the testimonium flavianum ant. The testimonium is probably the most discussed passage in josephus. A vast literature was produced over the centuries debating the authenticity of the testimonium flavianum, the testimony of flavius josephus. Revisiting eusebius use of the figure of moses in the life of constantine, finn damgaard 7. The testimonium flavianum meaning the testimony of flavius josephus is the name given to the passage found in book 18, chapter 3, 3 or see greek text of the antiquities in which josephus describes the condemnation and crucifixion of jesus at the hands of the roman authorities. This passage is generally called the testimonium flavianum.
This chapter charts how testimonium flavianum has been transmitted, interpreted, or ignored by christians. While i draw heavily on ken olson, and on the augmentation of olsons arguments by earl doherty, i like to think i also add a few extra layers of evidence here and. The extremely useful documenta catholica omnia website offers these same texts copied, as a matter of fact, from this page in a handy pdf format josephus on jesus. Origen, eusebius, and the accidental interpolation in josephus. This is the only direct discussion of jesus to be found in the writings of josephus. The testimonium flavianum queens university belfast. There, jesus, who was called christ, could be interpreted as if josephus did not consider jesus as being the christ. Philos writings attempted to merge judaism with platonic philoso phy. Also he claims that josephus ascribed the fall of jerusalem to the death of james, and eusebius even quotes his text. In general, that writing does not suffice conclusively to support either the historicity nor the divinity of jesus christ. Because it may be the most quoted ancient text next to the bible, this book not only illuminates the history of the testimonium flavianum through the ages, but also the. A view that has been prominent among american scholars was summarized in john meiers 1991 book, a marginal jew. The testimonium flavianum is a passage about jesus of nazareth that exists in all the extant manuscripts of book 18 of the jewish antiquities. It is impossible that this passage is entirely genuine.
Nor does he ever elsewhere combine a form of with in the. It is the most discussed passage in all of josephus writings and perhaps in all ancient literature. John takach has posted an argument for the full authenticity of the testimonium flavianum on his mortal resurrection weblog. Testimonium definition of testimonium by the free dictionary. Ga re tlhomamisege gore dipatlisiso tsa ga bardet di tla dira gore bakanoki bano ba fetole mogopolo ka testimonium flavianum. Many scholars today, christian and otherwise formally support the veracity of this assertion. The testimonium flavianum controversy from late antiquity to modern times is a history of this passage and the longstanding debate over its authenticity. An arabic version of the testimonium flavianum and its implications kitve haa. The general scholarly view is that while the testimonium flavianum is most likely not authentic in its entirety, it. A clue to the origi nal form of the testimonium flavianum, jewish quarterly. The testimonium flavianum controversy from late antiquity to modern times. Olson a eusebian reading of the testimonium flavianum 20. Pdf josephus, fifth evangelist, and jesus on the temple. If the testimonium flavianum was genuine in any way, josephus certainly would have mentioned the further misfortune of jesus followers under nero, since he was right there in rome for two years when it was supposedly going on.
Many try to discredit him because he wrote about jesus christ. Carleton paget, some observations on josephus and christianity, journal of theological studies, new ser. Pacifica, ca 94044, usa agapius of hierapolis and michael the syrians versions of the testimonium flavianum, a passage about jesus from josephus jewish antiquities, both derive from the syriac translation of eusebius of caesareas historia ecclesiastica. This opinion held that the paragraph was formed by a mixture of writers. In the 18th and 20th books, there are two little references to jesus that have inspired a massive literature on their authenticity or spuriousness.
The testimonium flavianum controversy from late antiquity to modern times, new york, 2003. In 1995 a discovery was published that brought important new evidence to the debate over the testimonium flavianum. The mystery of the testimonium flavianum a history from 93 ce to the present contents 1. Moreover, if this argument is valid, then it should be valid to excise the entire testimonium flavianum because it is parenthetical and because the flow of thought is interrupted by the passage see the argument above. The brief account of josephus referring to the crucifixion of jesus christ is at best a highly interpolated account, and at worst an absolute forgery. The testimonium flavianum reputed to be written by josephus, a jewish historian, has been used unsuccessfully to buttress both the historicity and the divinity of jesus christ. Pierre geoltrain yo e leng mankge yo o itsegeng wa tumelo ya segerika le sejuda le bokeresete jwa bogologolo, o ne a tlhatswega pelo fa a sena go bala dipatlisiso tsa ga bardet. Mar 03, 2014 an overwhelming majority of scholars believe that this passage is authentic, but there is another mention of jesus in antiquities known as the testimonium flavianum that many are divided on. Unfortunately, the text as we have it in extant copies of josephus antiquities appears to have been dramatically rewritten from a christian point of view. In this brief document the testimony of flavius josephus you will discover that the famed f.
As previously stated, the testimonium flavianum was the passage from his works they most often cited, although the passage about maria war 6, 2012, the jewish woman who ate her own child during the siege of jerusalem, was almost as popular. Publications of the israel academy of sciences and humanities. Steve mason states, to have created the testimonium out of whole cloth would be an act of unparalleled scribal audacity. A eusebian reading of the testimonium flavianum, ken olson. Regarding the quotes from the historian josephus about jesus. Testimonium flavianum wikipedia, a enciclopedia livre. Scholars have differing views on the authenticity of the testimonium.
Origens assertions about josephus who did not receive jesus for christ could have been partly based on josephus ant. What arguments can be used against testimonium flavianum. Pdf this contribution aims at deconstructing a christian master narrative that interprets josephus as crucial. The extremely useful documenta catholica omnia website offers these same texts copied. An arabic version of the testimonium flavianum and its. Bruce tells us why we can trust this ancient jewish historian. Feldman noted that 4 scholars regarded the testimonium flavianum as entirely genuine, 6 as mostly genuine, 20 accept it with some interpolations, 9 with several interpolations, and regard it as being totally an interpolation. Caesars messiah the roman conspiracy to invent jesus.
Josephus also, though not believing in jesus as the christ messiah, is a witness by his testimony to the killing of james the just, the brother of jesus called the christ messiah as the cause of the fall of jerusalem, whereas, according to origen, he should have said that it was the plot against jesus. Murdock uses to prove her case for the testimonium flavianum being a complete forgery are mostly al moot. Flavius josephus and his testimony concerning the historical jesu. As previously stated, the testimonium flavianum was the passage from his works they most often cited, although the passage about maria war 6, 2012, the jewish woman who ate her own child during the siege of jerusalem, was almost as popular during this period as the testimonium flavianum. Her claims that josephus would have written much more of jesus if. A eusebian reading of the testimonium flavianum, ken olson 6. Olson, eusebius and the testimonium flavianum, catholic biblical quarterly. The testimonium flavianum question flavius josephus published a history of the jews in twenty books around 93 ce. For the first time it was pointed out that josephus description of jesus showed an unusual similarity with another early description of jesus. Combine this with the fact that origen clearly does not refer to. The testimonium flavianum meaning the testimony of flavius josephus is a passage found in book 18, chapter 3, 3 or see greek text of the antiquities which describes the condemnation and crucifixion of jesus at the hands of the roman authorities. Prior to eusebius, the testimonium flavianum was not known.
Written at the end of the first century ad, the testimonium flavianum is a report about the life of jesus. Murdock when addressing the mythical nature of jesus christ, one issue repeatedly raised is the purported evidence of his existence to be found in the writings of flavius josephus, the famed jewish general and historian who lived from about 37 to 100 ce. Isaac casaubon, the jews, and a forgotten chapter in renaissance scholarship by anthony grafton and joanna weinberg belknap press, 380 pp. It examines the debate surrounding its authenticity that began already in the sixteenth century. Probably the dominant opinion on the testimonium flavianum in recent historical. Josephus makes no mention of the further misfortune of jesus followers that tacitus and suetonius record. The testimonium flavianum is a passage about jesus of nazareth that exists in all the extant manuscripts of book 18 of the jewish antiquities 18. Testimony of flavius josephus was a jewish historian who wrote history for the roman government.
Josephus as a witness to the biblical canon, 15661823. The testimonium flavianum in syriac and arabic alice whealey 216 stanley ave. Testimonium synonyms, testimonium pronunciation, testimonium translation, english dictionary definition of testimonium. Flavius josephus and his testimony concerning the historical jesus marian hillar center for philosophy and socinian studies, houston, tx lecture presented for the sciencereligion discussion club, institute on religion in an age of. Many scholars, despite her claims to the contrary, do in fact believe that the testimonium is partially authentic, though not entirely.
265 8 1599 1325 1065 70 436 1456 619 456 1371 273 816 1407 167 439 34 1376 433 1651 1350 660 527 241 1238 838 365 647 382 426 1311 448 787 1630 166 647 919 1407 702 69 444 755 385 1010 1029